MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411737453 · doi:10.3390/app15137204

Data-Driven Computational Methods in Fuel Combustion: A Review of Applications

2025· review· en· W4411737453 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jacek Łukasz Wilk-Jakubowski, Łukasz Pawlik, Damian Frej, Grzegorz Wilk-Jakubowski

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombustionEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This review article provides a comprehensive analysis of the recent advancements in combustion science and engineering, focusing on the application of machine learning and genetic algorithms from 2015 to 2024. The study examines the integration of computational methods, including computational fluid dynamics, neural networks, and genetic algorithms, with various fuel types such as biodiesel, biomass, coal, gasoline, hydrogen, and natural gas. A systematic search in the Scopus database identified relevant articles, which were categorized based on fuel types and computational methodologies. The analysis covers key areas such as combustion modelling and simulation, engine applications, alternative fuels, pollutant control, and industrial combustion systems. This review highlights the growing role of machine learning and genetic algorithms in enhancing combustion efficiency, reducing emissions, and optimizing energy production, providing insights into the current state of the art and future trends in this critical field. The study further examines the geographical distribution of research, noting significant contributions from Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Iran, Japan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, alongside other international contributions. A total of 165 peer-reviewed articles were analyzed, covering a range of combustion scenarios and fuel types. The most frequently applied methods include artificial neural networks (ANNs), support vector machines (SVMs), and random forests (RFs) for predictive modeling, as well as genetic algorithms (GAs) for system optimization. ANN-based models achieved high accuracy in predicting NOx emissions and flame speed, with some studies reporting mean absolute errors below 5%. GA methods demonstrated effectiveness in fuel blend optimization and geometry design, achieving emission reductions of up to 30% in experimental setups. This review also highlights persistent challenges such as data availability, model generalization, and reproducibility, and proposes future directions toward more interpretable and standardized applications of ML/GA in combustion science.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied SciencesSame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207