MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411737831 · doi:10.9734/air/2025/v26i41390

Impact of Immediate Treatment on Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with Hemodynamic Instability

2025· article· en· W4411737831 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulmonary embolismHemodynamicsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims: This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes, mortality, and safety profile of immediate therapeutic interventions—including systemic thrombolysis, surgical embolectomy, and catheter-directed therapies—for acute pulmonary embolism (APE) in adult patients presenting with hemodynamic instability. It also assesses the timing of interventions and outcomes across specific subgroups, such as elderly and comorbid patients. Study Design: Systematic literature review. Place and Duration of Study: Databases searched (PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, BVS, MEDLINE) between January 2014 and April 2024. Methodology: The review followed PRISMA guidelines. Studies published from 2014 to 2024 were included if they evaluated immediate treatment strategies in adult patients with high-risk APE and hemodynamic instability. Eligible study designs included randomized clinical trials, cohort studies, and multicenter analyses. Data extraction and quality assessment (using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool) were performed independently by two reviewers. Results: Of 487 studies identified, 32 met all inclusion criteria, encompassing 2,761 patients. Systemic thrombolysis showed a significant reduction in mortality and faster hemodynamic stabilization compared to anticoagulation alone, but with an increased risk of major bleeding, particularly intracranial hemorrhage. Surgical and catheter-directed embolectomy demonstrated similar efficacy to thrombolysis, with potentially fewer bleeding complications in high-risk subgroups. Early intervention (within 2 hours of diagnosis) was consistently associated with better outcomes. Conclusion: Immediate reperfusion therapy is essential for improving survival and reducing complications in high-risk APE patients with hemodynamic instability. While thrombolysis remains the first-line treatment, embolectomy represents a safe and effective alternative when thrombolysis is contraindicated. Further randomized, multicenter trials are needed to optimize patient stratification and refine therapeutic algorithms tailored to comorbid and elderly populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.395 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it