MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411744677 · doi:10.1093/humrep/deaf097.266

O-266 Decoding the clinical fate of segmental mosaic embryos: key predictors of implantation and pregnancy success

2025· article· en· W4411744677 on OpenAlexaff
Francesca Spinella, Svetlana Madjunkova, Andria G. Besser, Anıl Biricik, Ermanno Greco, I Listorti, Dung Phạm, Vincent Nguyen, Manuel Viotti

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Reproduction · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsCReATe Fertility CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMosaicPregnancyEmbryoDecoding methodsKey (lock)MedicineBiologyObstetricsGynecologyAndrologyComputer scienceGeneticsTelecommunicationsComputer securityArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Study question Does the implantation and pregnancy success of segmental mosaic embryos depend on mosaicism level and aneuploidy type, and can specific chromosomal patterns predict clinical outcomes? Summary answer Higher segmental mosaicism levels reduce implantation and pregnancy rates. Specific chromosomes are linked to implantation failure, underscoring the need for refined embryo selection criteria. What is known already Mosaic embryos can contain normal and abnormal cells due to mitotic errors. Initially classified as aneuploid, they began being transferred after 2015 when no euploid options were available. Segmental mosaics involve partial chromosomal alterations and show better outcomes than whole-chromosome mosaics. PGT-A detects mosaicism, but classification criteria vary. Factors like mosaicism degree and aneuploidy type impact implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates. Although segmental mosaics are frequently transferred, data remain limited. Current research aims to standardize PGT-A reporting and optimize embryo selection, providing patients with better reproductive options while ensuring safe and effective embryo transfer practices in IVF. Study design, size, duration This retrospective study analyzed 3,790 mosaic embryos from the International Registry of Mosaic Embryo Transfers (IRMET) (2017–2024), classified via PGT-A into segmental mosaics (1,567), whole-chromosome mosaics (1,723), and euploids (19,258). Mosaic embryos were categorized by mosaicism level, aneuploidy type, and morphology. Implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates were assessed. Standardized sequencing platforms ensured consistency. Statistical models examined correlations between embryo characteristics and outcomes. Participants/materials, setting, methods Data were collected from 20 IVF centers in IRMET. Embryos were classified as segmental mosaic, whole-chromosome mosaic, or euploid via PGT-A. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on mosaicism level, aneuploidy type (deletions vs. duplications), and biopsy timing). Morphological grading (ICM and TE grades) and chromosomal segment size were analyzed. Logistic regression and chi-square tests evaluated statistical significance, ensuring robust conclusions on embryo implantation and pregnancy success. Main results and the role of chance Segmental mosaics had a 45.5% ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), higher than whole-chromosome mosaics (34.3%) but lower than euploids (50%) (p < 0.005). OPR declined with increasing mosaicism: 50% at 20%, 45% at 30–40%, and 27% at 60%. Single deletions had a 46.3% OPR, outperforming single duplications (41%), with miscarriage rates of 10% and 12%, respectively. Chromosome-specific analyses identified certain chromosomes linked to higher implantation failure. Small deletions (OPR=47%) had better outcomes than large deletions (OPR=43%). Short-arm deletions achieved a 51% OPR, whereas long-arm duplications resulted in a lower OPR (44%). Biopsy timing also influenced outcomes: embryos biopsied on days 4–5 had an OPR of 55%, significantly higher than those biopsied on day 5 (35%) and day 6 (29%) Morphology also played a role, with higher-quality embryos showing better success. These findings highlight the complex interplay of mosaicism, chromosomal patterns, and morphological grading in determining embryo viability. Limitations, reasons for caution Retrospective design and IVF center variability may limit generalizability. While findings suggest key embryo selection factors, prospective studies are needed for validation. Standardizing PGT-A reporting could improve transfer decision-making, ensuring more precise clinical applications and minimizing risks associated with mosaic embryo transfers in reproductive medicine. Wider implications of the findings This study emphasizes the role of mosaicism level, aneuploidy type, and morphology in determining segmental mosaic embryo viability. Standardized PGT-A reporting and refined transfer guidelines could enhance clinical outcomes, allowing for better utilization of mosaic embryos while mitigating implantation risks, thereby optimizing success rates in IVF and assisted reproduction. Trial registration number No

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman ReproductionSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207