MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411746994 · doi:10.1029/2025tc008955

The Inter‐Cratonic Neoproterozoic Katangan Basin of Central Africa: Rift Basin Formation, Orogenic Inversion and Potential Fluid Pathways

2025· article· en· W4411746994 on OpenAlexaff
M. C. Daly, M. Zimba, Martin Purkiss, Francis Chibesakunda

Bibliographic record

VenueTectonics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsFirst Quantum Minerals (Canada)
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilUK Research and Innovation
KeywordsGeologyRiftStructural basinInversion (geology)Paleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The tectono‐stratigraphic development of continental basins is critical to an understanding of continental tectonics and the formation of metal deposits. The Neoproterozoic, inter‐cratonic Katangan copper basin of Central Africa records a tectono‐stratigraphic evolution and the generation of potential metal transporting fluid pathways. Integration of lithospheric structure, quantitative basin analysis, sediment routing systems, and basin structure defines the tectono‐stratigraphic model of the basin. The basin lies between the Congo and Kalahari cratons, on lithosphere distinctly thinner than the adjacent craton cores. Crustal scale fault zones parallel the craton margins and suggest lithospheric weaknesses influenced the basin shape. Basin subsidence analysis indicates two phases of rift‐driven subsidence and increasing lithospheric extension from the basin boundary to a Central Rift Zone (CRZ). The CRZ also marks a sediment provenance boundary. Drill core and seismic reflection data show extensional, half graben geometries. Subsequent, Late Ediacaran and Cambrian orogenesis and basin closure and inversion occurred regionally and most intensively within the CRZ. The deformation resulted in crustal thickening, preserved as a ∼50 km wide zone of garnet‐amphibolite facies metamorphism. The CRZ is underlain by relatively thin, continental lithosphere, and is characterized by intense orogenic tectonics and inversion of the earlier formed rifts. The reactivated fault structures imply crustal weakening and define several tectonic domains that occur as fluid pathways for high volume fluid migration of metal bearing brines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score0.634

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTectonicsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207