MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411749228 · doi:10.1177/12034754251341842

Foundations of Canadian Indigenous Medicine (Part I): The Medicine Wheel, Cultural Frameworks, and Traditional Healing Practices

2025· review· en· W4411749228 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Nadine Elias Dababneh, Said Dababneh, Samantha Barakat, Josephine H. Cox, William Chiskamish, Alexandra Kelly, Sammy Pootoo, Putulik Ilisituk, Parsa Kitishimik, Serena Weetaltuk, Annie Kumarluk, Richard Moorhouse, Martha Inukpuk, Michael Lefson, Ivan V. Litvinov

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsSt Mary's Hospital CentreMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health CentreUniversité de Montréal
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéInstitute of Indigenous Peoples' HealthLEO Fondet
KeywordsIndigenousPrayerTraditional knowledgeHarmony (color)MedicineTraditional medicineEnvironmental ethicsAlternative medicineHolistic healthAestheticsAnthropologySociologyEcologyReligious studiesArtVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traditional medicine has been a vital part of Indigenous Canadian heritage for over 12,000 years. Rooted in ancestral knowledge and deep respect for nature, it involves sacred ceremonies, medicinal plants, and holistic health practices. The Medicine Wheel symbolizes this interconnectedness, emphasizing balance among mind, body, spirit, and emotions. Traditional healing methods include prayer, chanting, sweat lodges, and talking circles, reinforcing harmony within individuals and communities. Knowledge is passed down orally by Elders, preserving both medical and cultural wisdom. Indigenous groups, including the Cree, Algonquin, Haudenosaunee, and Inuit, each have unique healing traditions that reflect their environment and beliefs. More than 400 plants are used in traditional medicine. These medicinal plants are seen as sacred, deeply respected, and their gifts to the community are acknowledged. Ceremonial plants such as tobacco, sweetgrass, and cedar hold spiritual and medicinal significance and are used in purification and healing rituals. Despite regional variations, Indigenous medicine remains integral to community well-being and cultural preservation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score0.748

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→