MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411749547 · doi:10.1093/humrep/deaf097.618

P-310 Comorbidity profiles in women with endometriosis in the ComPaRe-Endometriosis cohort

2025· article· en· W4411749547 on OpenAlexaff
N M Mokraoui, A Naji, Solène Gouesbet, Zélia Breton, Viet-Thi Tran, Hélène Amazouz, Marina Kvaskoff

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Reproduction · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometriosis Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndometriosisComorbidityMedicineCohortCohort studyGynecologyObstetricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Study question To identify comorbidity profiles in women with endometriosis in ComPaRe-Endometriosis cohort Summary answer This study identified distinct comorbidity profiles (7) in women with endometriosis What is known already Endometriosis is associated with an increased risk of various chronic diseases, including autoimmune, atopic, psychiatric, and pain-related conditions. Although many studies have examined the links between endometriosis and individual diseases, very few have focused on associations with multiple comorbidities Study design, size, duration Study design: Cross-sectional study Size: 10,761 women with endometriosis Duration: E-cohort initiated in 2018. Analysis conducted on data at inclusion Participants/materials, setting, methods ComPaRe-Endometriosis is a prospective e-cohort initiated in 2018 and following over 10,000 women with endometriosis. Participants self-reported their chronic conditions at baseline from a list of 87 diseases. We conducted a cross-sectional study and used hierarchical clustering to identify baseline comorbidity profiles, and we described the socioeconomic, lifestyle, disease, and patient characteristics associated with each profile. Main results and the role of chance Among 10,761 participants, 64.2% reported only endometriosis, while 35.8% reported at least one comorbidity (1 comorbidity: 52.7%, 2: 22.9%, 3: 10.2%, 4: 5.4%, 5+: 8.8%). We identified seven clusters of participants: Cluster 1 (n = 8,656) included endometriosis patients with less comorbidities; Cluster 2 (n = 693) included mostly those with chronic pain (44.3%), irritable bowel syndrome (40.4%), and/or fibromyalgia (33.3%); Cluster 3 (n = 193) those with depression (99.5%) and/or anxiety (14.0%); Cluster 4 (n = 532) those with asthma (57.9%), allergies (36.5%), and/or chronic skin diseases (30.6%); Cluster 5 (n = 185) those with ovarian cysts/polycystic ovary syndrome (100%); Cluster 6 (n = 299) those with thyroid diseases (100%); and Cluster 7 (n = 203) those with migraine (100%) Limitations, reasons for caution Limitation: -Self reported diagnoses - Representativeness of the sample (the cohort of patients cannot be generalized to the general population) Wider implications of the findings These findings highlight the need for multidisciplinary care addressing the complex interactions between endometriosis and multiple physiological systems, offering new perspectives for improving disease management and guiding future research Trial registration number No

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman ReproductionSame topicEndometriosis Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207