MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411750322 · doi:10.1093/humrep/deaf097.237

O-237 An image-based Artificial Intelligence (AI) model trained to predict blastocyst development from oocyte images correlates with key embryonic developmental parameters in a large dataset

2025· article· en· W4411750322 on OpenAlexaff
J Teruel Lopez, M Alavés Navarro, J Crespo Simó, Saeid Alavi Naeini, N Mercuri, A Krivoi, J Fjeldstad

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Reproduction · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsCReATe Fertility Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlastocystOocyteArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceBiologyEmbryogenesisAndrologyPattern recognition (psychology)Machine learningMedicineEmbryoCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Study question Does MAGENTA, an AI model built to predict blastocyst development from mature oocyte images, correlate with indicators of embryonic development? Summary answer Higher MAGENTA scores correlate with blastulation and key parameters of embryonic development progression—day-3 embryo fragmentation rate, blastocyst morphology and usage fate. What is known already The oocyte is the major contributor of cytoplasmic organelles, cell membranes, and maternal mRNA that support early embryonic development. Despite the oocyte’s vital contributions to the developmental potential of blastocysts, non-invasive and objective oocyte evaluation methods are lacking. MAGENTA is a non-invasive AI tool that assesses metaphase II(MII) oocyte images, providing a score of 0-10 with higher scores indicating a higher potential for blastocyst development. While MAGENTA was only trained to predict blastulation, its scores have shown correlation with other indicators of embryo development, highlighting the contribution of oocyte quality to the success of embryonic development and the overall cycle. Study design, size, duration This validation study included a dataset of 15,521 images of fresh denuded MII oocytes immediately post-ICSI (6964 donor, 8557 patient oocytes; age: 18-48 years from a Spanish fertility clinic. 7734 oocytes developed into blastocysts while 7787 oocytes did not (2458 non-fertilized, 611 abnormally fertilized). Oocyte images and accompanying clinical parameters were assessed by MAGENTA to produce scores (0-10), indicating chances of blastocyst development, which were also divided into four groups (0-2.5,2.6-5, 5.1-7.5, 7.6-10) for analysis. Participants/materials, setting, methods MAGENTA scores were compared to true blastocyst development outcomes and analyzed for correlation with key embryo development parameters—day-3 fragmentation percentage, blastocyst development, blastocyst quality, and blastocyst usage fate as decided by embryologists. Embryologist-assigned Gardner grading included 1079 excellent-quality (ICM and TE=A), 4940 good-quality (ICM/TE=B), 1264 fair-quality (ICM/TE=C), and 376 poor-quality (ICM/TE=D) blastocysts. Correlation analyses were assessed by Welch’s t-test, One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post-hoc pairwise comparisons, or Two Proportions z-test. Main results and the role of chance Oocyte MAGENTA scores decreased significantly in a stepwise manner with higher day-3 embryo fragmentation rates(p < 0.01), except between 11-25% and 26-35% groups(p = 0.99) (≤10%[6.5, n = 10286], 11-25%[5.5, n = 1696], 26-35%[5.6, n = 178], >35%[4.5, n = 149]). A similar relationship was found when assessing only oocytes that developed into blastocysts(≤10%[6.9, n = 6907], 11-25%[6.2, n = 716], 26-35%[6.7, n = 48], >35%[4.1, n = 22])(p < 0.01), except between 11-25% and 26-35% groups(p = 0.64). Oocytes that developed into blastocysts also had significantly higher MAGENTA scores than those that did not(6.9 vs. 5.1, p < 0.0001), with a stepwise increase in the proportion of blastocysts developed within each sequential MAGENTA score group (26%[n = 3058], 44%[n = 2855], 52%[n = 3323], 63%[n = 6285]). Subgroup analysis revealed an increase in oocyte MAGENTA scores with increasing blastocyst quality: Non-blastocysts vs. Poor (5.1 vs. 6, p < 0.0001), Poor vs. Fair (6 vs. 6.2, p = 0.62), Fair vs. Good (6.2 vs. 6.9, p < 0.0001), Good vs. Excellent (6.9 vs. 7.5, p < 0.0001). Similarly, there was a significant stepwise increase in the proportion of Excellent blastocysts (2.1%, 4%, 7%, 11%; p < 0.0001) and Good blastocysts (15%, 28%, 34%, 41%; p < 0.0001) within sequentially increasing MAGENTA score groups. Additionally, MAGENTA scores correlated with blastocyst usage decisions by embryologists, with significantly higher MAGENTA scores for oocyte that became embryos selected for transfer(7.2,n=407) or cryopreservation (6.9,n=6733) than those discarded (5.2,n=8379; both p < 0.0001). Limitations, reasons for caution Analysis of day-3 embryo fragmentation was limited by small sample sizes of 26-35% and >35% groups. Poor-quality sample size was limited compared to other quality groups. Additional data is needed to further elucidate any quality differences between oocytes that develop into embryos chosen for fresh transfers and for cryopreservation. Wider implications of the findings MAGENTA’s oocyte assessments correlate with key parameters of embryonic development, such as fragmentation, blastocyst development, quality, and utilization, which are linked to implantation potential. These results highlight the critical role of oocytes in driving embryonic development and MAGENTA’s potential to offer valuable insights into cycle potential from the oocyte stage. Trial registration number No

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman ReproductionSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207