MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411753607 · doi:10.1101/2025.06.26.25330387

Predictors of employment attrition in Lebanon during multifaceted crises: The role of chronic diseases – a national cross-sectional study

2025· preprint· en· W4411753607 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Myriam Dagher, Ali Abboud, Ghada E. Saad, Rita Itani, Hala Ghattas, Stephen J. McCall

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research CentreUNICEF
KeywordsAttritionCross-sectional studyDemographic economicsPsychologyEnvironmental healthPolitical scienceMedicineEconomicsPathologyDentistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic and Lebanon’s ongoing economic crisis exacerbated existing inequalities, including workforce disparities. This study identified predictors of employment attrition during Lebanon’s concurrent crises and examined the association between chronic conditions and employment attrition. This cross-sectional study recruited adults aged 19-64 years residing in Lebanon through random digit dialing (5 January – 9 July 2024). Data collected included socio-demographics, household characteristics, employment, and self-reported chronic conditions. The outcome was the loss of paid employment (employment attrition) during the crises. Predictors were identified through LASSO regression and model discrimination and calibration were assessed. Logistic regression models, adjusted for covariates identified through directed acyclic graphs, assessed the association between number and types of chronic conditions and employment attrition. Of 2103 participants employed prior to the onset of the concurrent crises (pre-2020), 72.7% were males, 70.1% were Lebanese, and 14.7% became unemployed during the crises. Predictors of employment attrition were: older age, females, non-Lebanese, married, no formal education, having at least one chronic condition, working in a private or non-governmental organization, and having an oral agreement with employer. The predictive model demonstrated a moderate to good discriminative ability and good calibration. Pre-existing chronic conditions, such as cardiovascular disease (aOR: 2.15; 95% CI, 1.27 to 3.64) and diabetes (aOR: 2.52; 95% CI, 1.43 to 4.45), were independently associated with employment attrition. This study underscores the need to address life-course disparities contributing to job loss and to consider proactive job protections to mitigate workforce disruptions during multiple crises, particularly in contexts where social safety nets are absent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicEmployment and Welfare Studies→French-language works237,207→