MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411754998 · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqaf087

MOLGENIS VIP: an end-to-end DNA variant interpretation pipeline for research and diagnostics configurable to support rapid implementation of new methods

2025· article· en· W4411754998 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
W Maassen, Lennart Johansson, Bart Charbon, Dennis Hendriksen, Sander van den Hoek, Mariska Slofstra, René Mulder, Martine T. Meems-Veldhuis, Robert Sietsma, Henny H. Lemmink, Cleo C. van Diemen, Mariëlle van Gijn, Morris A. Swertz

Bibliographic record

VenueNAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
KeywordsScalabilityPipeline (software)Computer scienceData scienceDNA sequencingGenomeVariety (cybernetics)SoftwareProtocol (science)Computational biologyData miningBiologyMedicineArtificial intelligenceGeneticsDatabaseGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Achieving high yield in genetics research and genome diagnostics is a significant challenge because it requires a combination of multiple strategies and large-scale genomic analysis using the latest methods. Existing diagnostic software infrastructures are often unable to cope with high demands for versatility and scalability. We developed MOLGENIS VIP, a flexible, scalable, high-throughput, open-source, and "end-to-end" pipeline to process different types of sequencing data into portable, prioritized variant lists for immediate clinical interpretation in a wide variety of scenarios. VIP supports interpretation of short- and long-read sequencing data, using best-practice annotations and classification trees without complex IT infrastructures. VIP is developed within the long-living MOLGENIS open-source project to provide sustainability and has integrated feedback from a growing international community of users. VIP has undergone genome diagnostic laboratory testing and harnesses experiences from multiple Dutch, European, Canadian, and African diagnostic and infrastructural initiatives (VKGL, EU-Solve-RD, EJP-RD, CINECA, GA4GH). We provide a step-by-step protocol for installing and using VIP. We demonstrate VIP using 25 664 previously classified variants from the VKGL, and 18 and 41 diagnosed patients from a routine diagnostics and a Solve-RD research cohort, respectively. We believe that VIP accelerates causal variant detection and innovation in genome diagnostics and research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNAR Genomics and BioinformaticsSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207