Latency-Aware Pruning and Quantization of Self-Supervised Speech Transformers for Edge Devices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The growing adoption of self-supervised learning transformers for speech (speech SSL) is constrained by their significant computational and memory demands, making deployment on resource-constrained edge devices challenging. We propose a latency-aware compression framework that integrates structured pruning and quantization to address these challenges. Guided by a latency model that considers the combined effects of pruning and quantization, our method dynamically identifies and removes less critical blocks while maintaining task performance, avoiding the inefficiencies of over-pruning and under-pruning seen in prior approaches. Unlike prior methods specialized in either post-training compression without fine-tuning data or in cases where fine-tuning data is available, our method is effective in both settings. Experimental results show that, in task-agnostic compression, our method achieves a 4.2× speedup on the Hikey970 edge development platform, outperforming previous task-agnostic pruning methods in most tasks, while requiring only 21–24 GPU hours—a 3× reduction compared to prior methods. Additionally, our method achieves a lower word error rate of 7.8% using task-specific pruning, while reducing computational overhead by approximately 19.4% in terms of GFLOPs compared to previous task-specific methods. Finally, our method consistently achieves higher accuracy than the state-of-the-art post-training compression approach across various latency speedup constraints, even without fine-tuning data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".