MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411758042 · doi:10.1093/humrep/deaf097.105

O-105 Reconsidering the clinical value of 1PN-derived embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4411758042 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
B M Barbagallo, Alessandro Bartolacci, Anna Cecchele, Vincenzo Pavone, Elisa Rabellotti, Enrico Papaleo, Luca Pagliardini

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Reproduction · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisValue (mathematics)BiologyMedicineInternal medicineStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Study question Are monopronucleated (1PN)-derived embryos euploid and suitable for embryo transfer? Summary answer 1PN-derived embryos showed lower biological and clinical outcomes compared to 2PN-derived embryos, but similar euploidy, live-birth with euploid blastocyst transfer, and neonatal malformations. What is known already In assisted reproductive treatments (ARTs), normal fertilization typically results in zygotes displaying two pronuclei (2PN). However, some oocytes exhibit abnormal fertilization patterns, i.e. a single pronucleus “1PN”. The 1PN-derived embryos have often been used with caution due to concerns about their compromised developmental competence, as they are frequently associated with an increased risk of polyploidy. Currently, guidelines from the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology affirmed that 1PN-derived embryos should not be recommended for clinical use. Nonetheless, several studies have reported healthy live birth from 1PN embryos. Study design, size, duration This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. A systematic literature search was performed up to 31 November 2024. PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS were systematically searched for peer-reviewed original papers using relevant keywords and Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms: (“1PN” OR “monopronucleated”) AND (“pregnancy” OR “live birth” OR “euploidy” OR “clinical outcomes” OR “blastulation rate” OR “embryo quality” OR “embryo development”). Participants/materials, setting, methods Studies assessing developmental competence and clinical outcomes from 1PN-derived embryos were included. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The primary outcome was live-birth. Secondary outcomes included, cleavage, blastulation, euploidy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and malformation rates. Odds ratios (OR, 95%CI) were calculated by applying a random effects model. Sub-analyses were performed for: i) 1PN-derived embryos from a time-lapse system; ii) euploid blastocyst transfer; iii) 1PN-derived embryos from ICSI vs conventional IVF. Main results and the role of chance A total of 20 studies were included in the meta-analysis. 1PN-derived embryos showed significantly reduced cleavage [OR = 0.17 95%CI (0.12-0.24), p-value<0.00001], blastulation [OR = 0.25 95%IC (0.17-0.36, p-value<0.00001], clinical pregnancy [OR = 0.73 95%CI (0.62-0.87), p-value=0.0002], and live birth rates [OR = 0.76 95%CI (0.62-0.94), p-value= 0.01] compared to 2PN-derived embryos. No significant differences were observed in euploidy rate [OR = 0.98 95%CI (0.40-2.38),p-value=0.96], good quality embryos [OR = 0.86 95%CI (0.26-2.79),p-value=0.68], good quality blastocyst [OR = 0.44 95%CI (0.18-1.07),p-value=0.07], malformation rate [OR = 1.37 95%CI (0.57-3.31),p-value=0.48], miscarriage rate [OR = 1.00 95% CI (0.71-1.41), p-value=1.00], and low birthweight [OR = 0.90 95%IC (0.44-1.86), p-value=0.78]. A higher risk of polyploidy was found in 1PN-derived embryos [OR = 2.88 95%IC (0.87-9.48), p-value=0.08], although not statistically significant. No differences in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were observed following euploid blastocyst transfer [OR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.36–1.43), p-value=0.34] and [OR = 0.65, 95% CI (0.41–1.02), p-value=0.06], respectively. A significant reduction in the blastulation rate was also observed in 1PN-derived embryos analyzed using time-lapse technology [OR = 0.16, 95% CI (0.09–0.26), p-value<0.00001]. Interestingly, we found a significant reduction in pregnancy and live birth rates for 1PN-derived embryos from ICSI compared to 1PN-derived embryos from cIVF [OR = 0.43 95%CI (0.23-0.80), p-value=0.007] and [OR = 0.47 95%CI (022-1.01), p-value=0.05]. Limitations, reasons for caution The major limitation of this analysis is represented by the observational nature of the studies (prospective or retrospective) included, but they are the only source of evidence available in the literature. Furthermore, we observed heterogeneity between studies; to compensate for this limitation, we adopted a conservative approach using random-effects models. Wider implications of the findings Although 1PN-derived embryos exhibited lower embryo development, they showed potential for healthy live births, particularly when euploid. Howewer, due to the risk of polyploidy, their use should be restricted to PGT-A cycles. These findings suggest the development of more inclusive and flexible guidelines, potentially improving cumulative success rates. Trial registration number No

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.849

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.234
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman ReproductionSame topicPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchFrench-language works237,207