MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411758386 · doi:10.3171/2025.2.peds24457

Application and outcomes of a standardized, evidence-based institutional approach to simple tethered cord management

2025· article· en· W4411758386 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas M. Moriarty, William Gump, Ian Mutchnick, Joy Comingore, Michael W. Daniels, Dennis S. Peppas, Eran Rosenberg, Jeffrey T. White, Karen Moeller

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)NeurosurgeryDeep veinThrombosisEvidence-based medicineSurgeryAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: There is significant evidence in the literature and decades of practice experience that support filum terminale sectioning as an effective intervention to improve the symptoms of simple tethered cord (sTC). The diagnosis of sTC and indications for sTC surgery vary widely across the US and Canada, although the overall incidence of sTC surgery has been increasing across the US. This study sought to create and evaluate an evidence-based algorithm for the management of sTC. METHODS: An institutional standard for sTC management was established, based on an evidence-based medicine analysis of 93 papers from the literature. A prospective, IRB-approved study of all patients treated with these strictly delimited indications in 2019 was undertaken. Demographic, clinical, diagnostic, consultative, and outcome data were collected for all patients. Operated patients were seen at 6 weeks and 6 months for follow-up. Postoperative outcomes were recorded on a 4-point ordinal scale (worse, same, better, resolved) for analysis. RESULTS: Seven hundred twenty-nine unique patients were evaluated for possible sTC in 1 calendar year. One hundred fifty-one operations were performed. Two minor complications were noted (surgical wound breakdown and upper extremity deep vein thrombosis). All operated patients were clinically symptomatic, 79% of whom had 3 or more symptoms of sTC syndrome. Patients were seen by 3 or more subspecialists before surgery in 60% of the cases; no patient had fewer than 2 subspecialists involved in diagnosis. Postoperative results recorded by neurosurgery were strongly concordant with results observed by consultants. Significant improvement of symptomatic sTC was found across all symptoms (bladder/bowel/back pain/leg pain/gait/headache/tone) in the majority of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Filum terminale release for patients with sTC is a low-morbidity, high-impact intervention that can be beneficial to many children. A standardized set of operative indications driven by a multidisciplinary, evidence-based algorithm for sTC had high accuracy in identifying patients who benefit from a filum terminale release.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurosurgery PediatricsSame topicSpinal Dysraphism and MalformationsFrench-language works237,207