MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411759154 · doi:10.1101/2025.06.25.661424

PatternExtract: A facile, scalable pipeline for point pattern generation from spatial imaging data

2025· preprint· en· W4411759154 on OpenAlexaff
Shruti Sridhar, Gayatri Kumar, Siddham Jasoria, Ziwei Meng, Patrick Jaynes, Vaibhav Rajan, David W. Scott, Claudio Tripodo, Kasthuri Kannan, Anand D. Jeyasekharan

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalabilityPipeline (software)Computer sciencePoint (geometry)DatabaseGeometryOperating systemMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present PatternExtract, an open-source pipeline that generates accurate spatial point patterns from RGB pathology images and cell coordinate data without relying on composite channels or proprietary software. Using a novel two-kernel tissue segmentation method combined with automated pixel classification in QuPath, PatternExtract precisely excludes tissue artifacts such as necrosis and blood vessels to define spatial windows. Optimized on 568 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma images and validated on an independent cohort, the pipeline enables robust spatial analyses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topic3D Modeling in Geospatial ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207