Motor and default mode network states of rest in frontal lobe epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE), marked by recurrent seizures arising from the frontal lobes, can significantly impair cognitive and motor function, reducing quality of life. Recent studies suggest that epilepsies can involve functional networks throughout the brain that can be identified using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In this study, we aimed to determine whether FLE is associated with a distinct functional network brain states. Using dynamic functional connectivity analysis in combination with k -means clustering, we investigated dynamic connectivity patterns of the somatomotor network (SMN) and default mode network (DMN) of ten right-hemisphere and six left-hemisphere FLE patients, as well as nine healthy controls. We found two distinct states of rest for both the SMN and DMN: a high connectivity state and a lower, more variable connectivity state that was often specific to individual patients. Both FLE groups showed reduced overall connectivity compared to controls, with the greatest differences emerging during the low connectivity state. Right FLE patients and controls exhibited relatively uniform reductions, whereas left FLE patients showed spatially specific disruptions, including reduced lateral-to-medial SMN connectivity and decreased connectivity in posterior and left-lateralized DMN regions. Our findings suggest that dynamic connectivity analysis can uncover the temporal complexity and patient-specific nature of brain network disruption in FLE, supporting the development of personalized diagnostic and treatment strategies. Further research with larger cohorts is necessary to validate these results and explore additional factors affecting brain functional connectivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".