Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Masyarakat Bermukim Di Sempadan Rel Kereta Api Jl. Batang Hari - Jl. Karya Timur, Kecamatan Blimbing Kota Malang
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Permukiman di sempadan rel kereta api di Kota Malang, khususnya di Kecamatan Blimbing, meliputi wilayah di Jl. Batang Hari dan Jl. Karya Timur. Permukiman ini mencakup tiga kelurahan: Bunulrejo, Purwantoro, dan Blimbing. Berdasarkan pengukuran, jarak antara Jl. Batang Hari dan Jl. Karya Timur adalah 2.059,99 m², dengan lebar jalur rel ke permukiman sekitar 12 m², sehingga luas keseluruhan area adalah 4.143,98 m². Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif, dengan data yang dikumpulkan melalui survei primer (kuesioner dan wawancara) dan survei sekunder dari dinas terkait. Analisis dalam penelitian ini melibatkan beberapa tahapan, yaitu analisis deskriptif kuantitatif, analisis overlay, dan analisis skoring (pembobotan). Dari hasil analisis, ditemukan bahwa faktor utama yang menyebabkan masyarakat bermukim di sempadan rel kereta api ini adalah faktor sosial ekonomi. Indikator yang paling berpengaruh termasuk tingkat pendidikan, jenis pekerjaan masyarakat, dan jarak antara tempat tinggal dan lokasi pekerjaan. Faktor-faktor ini berperan besar dalam keputusan masyarakat untuk menetap di kawasan yang berisiko, seperti di sekitar jalur rel kereta api.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".