MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411771749 · doi:10.5539/ijsp.v14n2p13

Resampling-based Inference Procedure for Median Regression Estimator with Censored Data

2025· article· en· W4411771749 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Seung-Hwan Lee, Eunjoo Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistics and Probability · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIllinois Wesleyan University
KeywordsResamplingMathematicsStatisticsEstimatorInferenceRegressionComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantile regression has become increasingly popular across various disciplines due to its robustness, offering an alternative to traditional mean-based regression. Unlike traditional linear regression, quantile regression estimates conditional quantiles, capturing the full complexity of the relationships between variables (specifically, the conditional dependence of lifetime on covariates in lifetime analysis). However, inference procedures in quantile regression often involve complex non-parametric methods, as the variance of an estimator typically depends on the unknown error density, making it difficult to estimate. In this paper, we present a bootstrap-type resampling method that simplifies the construction of the inference procedures using the censored median regression estimator originally proposed by Yang (1999). Numerical simulations are performed to validate the proposed procedures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Statistics and ProbabilitySame topicFace and Expression RecognitionFrench-language works237,207