MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411778148 · doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1626915

Transcriptome sequencing revealed the regulation of stem internode length associated with mechanical harvesting in three tea varieties

2025· article· en· W4411778148 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaozeng Mi, Dahe Qiao, Chun Yang, Juan Chen, Sihui Liang, Yan Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Plant Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Reproductive Biology
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWRKY protein domainTranscriptomeBiologyGeneKEGGCandidate geneComputational biologyGeneticsTranscription factorRNA-SeqGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Internode length of tea plant is one of the key traits affecting the mechanical harvesting effect, but there are relatively few reports on their molecular regulatory. Methods Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed on it in order to explain its molecular mechanism. GO, KEGG enrichment and WGCNA were used to identify key genes, and their expression levels in three tea tree varieties were validated by qRT-PCR. Result In this study, we measured the internode lengths of the three varieties and found that their internode lengths were ‘ Feiyun ’ > ‘ Qiancha 1 ’ > ‘ Longjing 43 ’. 10,518 differentially expressed genes were identified through transcriptome sequencing and analysis. GO and KEGG enrichment showed that these differentially expressed genes were mainly enriched in plant hormone signal transduction and DNA-binding transcription factor activity pathways. WGCNA analysis identified two modules significantly correlated with internode length. Combining enrichment analysis with WGCNA results, 28 candidate genes associated with internode length were identified. In addition, it was found that the expression levels of DELLA and GA3ox were highly expressed in ‘ Longjing 43 ’, while GA2ox , WRKY , and ERF were highly expressed in ‘ Feiyun ’, showing significant positive and negative correlations with internode length, respectively. Discussion Our results provide candidate genes for studying the molecular mechanism of stem elongation, and provide a theoretical basis for selection machine harvested tea varieties and improvement of mechanical harvesting efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.325
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Plant ScienceSame topicPlant Reproductive BiologyFrench-language works237,207