MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411781039 · doi:10.3390/biomedicines13071586

Interferon Gamma and Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Are Inflammatory Biomarkers for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

2025· article· en· W4411781039 on OpenAlexaff
Ben Li, Raghad Abuhalimeh, Farah Shaikh, Houssam Younes, Batool Abuhalimeh, Abdelrahman Zamzam, Rawand Abdin, Mohammad Qadura

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedicines · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAtherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersBlair Foundation
KeywordsMaceMedicineMyocardial infarctionBiomarkerInternal medicineProspective cohort studyCohortProportional hazards modelCoronary artery diseaseCardiologyPercutaneous coronary interventionBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)—including heart attacks and strokes—are the leading cause of death in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD), yet biomarker research for MACE prediction in PAD patients remains limited. Inflammatory proteins play a key role in the progression of atherosclerosis and may serve as useful prognostic indicators for systemic cardiovascular risk in PAD. The objective of this study was to evaluate a broad panel of circulating inflammatory proteins to identify those independently associated with 2-year MACE in patients with PAD. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study involving 465 patients with PAD. Plasma concentrations of 15 inflammatory proteins were measured at baseline using validated immunoassays. Patients were followed over a two-year period for the development of MACE, defined as a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke, or mortality. Protein levels were compared between patients with and without MACE using the Mann–Whitney U test. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the independent association of each protein with MACE after adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical variables, including existing coronary and cerebrovascular disease. To validate the findings, a random forest machine learning model was developed to assess the relative importance of each protein for predicting 2-year MACE. Results: The mean age of the cohort was 71 years (SD 10), and 145 participants (31.1%) were female. Over the two-year follow-up, 84 patients (18.1%) experienced MACE. Six proteins were significantly elevated in PAD patients who developed MACE: interferon gamma (IFN-γ; 42.55 [SD 15.11] vs. 33.85 [SD 12.46] pg/mL, p < 0.001), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α; 9.00 [SD 5.00] vs. 4.65 [SD 4.29] pg/mL, p < 0.001), chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9 (CXCL9; 75.99 [SD 65.14] vs. 5.38 [SD 64.18] pg/mL, p = 0.002), macrophage inflammatory protein-1 beta (MIP-1β; 20.88 [SD 18.10] vs. 15.67 [SD 16.93] pg/mL, p = 0.009), MIP-1δ (25.29 [SD 4.22] vs. 17.98 [SD 4.01] pg/mL, p = 0.026), and interleukin-6 (IL-6; 12.50 [SD 40.00] vs. 6.72 [SD 38.98] pg/mL, p = 0.035). After adjusting for all baseline covariates, only two proteins—TNF-α (adjusted HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.28–2.33, p = 0.001) and IFN-γ (adjusted HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.12–2.29, p = 0.033)—remained significantly and independently associated with 2-year MACE. These findings were corroborated by the random forest model, where TNF-α and IFN-γ received the highest importance scores for predicting 2-year MACE: (TNF-α: 0.15 [95% CI 0.13–0.18], p = 0.002; IFN-γ: 0.19 [95% CI 0.17–0.21], p = 0.001). Conclusions: From a panel of 15 proteins, TNF-α and IFN-γ emerged as inflammatory biomarkers associated with 2-year MACE in PAD patients. Their measurement may aid in cardiovascular risk stratification, helping to identify high-risk individuals who could benefit from early multidisciplinary referrals to cardiology, neurology, and/or vascular medicine specialists to provide intensified medical therapy. Incorporating these biomarkers into PAD management may improve systemic cardiovascular outcomes through more personalized and targeted treatment approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomedicinesSame topicAtherosclerosis and Cardiovascular DiseasesFrench-language works237,207