Characterization of Matrix Pore Structure of a Deep Coal-Rock Gas Reservoir in the Benxi Formation, NQ Block, ED Basin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, a comprehensive experimental framework was developed to quantitatively characterize the pore structure of a deep coal-rock (DCR; reservoirs below [3000 m]) gas reservoir. Experimentally, petrological and mineral characteristics were determined by performing proximate analysis and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) as well as by measuring vitrinite reflectance and maceral components. Additionally, physisorption and high-pressure mercury injection (HPMI) tests were conducted to quantitatively characterize the nano- to micron-scale pores in the DCR gas reservoir at multiple scales. The DCR in the NQ Block is predominantly composed of vitrinite, accounting for approximately 77.75%, followed by inertinite. The pore space is predominantly characterized by cellular pores, but porosity development is relatively limited as most of such pores are extensively filled with clay minerals. The isothermal adsorption curves of CO2 and N2 in the NQ Block and the DJ Block exhibit very similar variation patterns. The pore types and morphologies of the DCR reservoir are relatively consistent, with a significant development of nanoscale pores in both blocks. Notably, micropore metrics per unit mass (pore volume (PV): 0.0242 cm3/g; and specific surface area (SSA): 77.7545 m2/g) indicate 50% lower gas adsorption potential in the DJ Block. In contrast, the PV and SSA of the mesopores per unit mass in the NQ Block are relatively consistent with those in the DJ and SF Blocks. Additionally, the peak mercury intake in the NQ Block occurs within the pore diameter < 20 nm, with nearly 60% of the mercury beginning to enter in large quantities only when the pore size exceeds 20 nm. This indicates that nanoscale pores are predominantly developed in the DCR of the NQ block, which aligns with the findings from physical adsorption experiments and SEM analyses. Overall, the development characteristics of multi-scale pores in the DCR formations of the NQ Block and the eastern part of the Basin are relatively similar, with both total PV and total SSA showing an L-shaped distribution. Due to the disparity in micropore SSA, however, the total SSA of the DJ Block is approximately twice that of the NQ Block. This discovery has established a robust foundation for the subsequent exploitation of natural gas resources in DCR formations within the NQ Block.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".