Platinum speciation in the presence of natural organic matter in a simplified freshwater medium investigated using HPSEC-ICP-MS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Environmental context Platinum is a metal of emerging concern in ecotoxicology, mainly due to its dissemination in the environment through the abrasion of car catalysts. However, its aqueous speciation in natural waters remains poorly known, and its binding to organic matter may modify its effects on organisms. Experimental measurements revealed the complex chemistry of Pt, low complexation and very slow kinetics. The use of PtII would be recommended for chronic exposure experiments. Rationale It is a common consensus that the free ion concentration of a metal in an aqueous medium can be a good indicator of its toxicity. In this context, the ability to determine metal speciation is of paramount importance to evaluate possible effect on aquatic ecosystems. Although speciation can be predicted for well-studied metals, the task is difficult when little information on thermodynamic constants is available, as is the case for platinum. It is then necessary to turn to experimental methods. Methodology For this purpose, a high-performance size exclusion liquid chromatography method coupled with inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry for online metal detection was used. In a synthetic freshwater medium, we first explored the inorganic speciation of platinum (added as PtIV) at pH 5 and 6, and using three equilibration periods (4 min, 48 h and 1 week). We then tested two different conditions with freshwater natural organic matter (NOM) from four different origins, both expected to provide different levels of complexation: low (pH = 5; [NOM] = 3 mg C L−1) and high (pH = 6; [NOM] = 10 mg C L−1). Results Several inorganic forms of platinum (PtII and PtIV) were identified, with good separation and repeatability. In the absence of NOM, dissociation of [PtIVCl6]2− complexes was clearly more important at pH 5 than at pH 6. Also, [PtIVCl6]2−persisted over time, even after 1 week, even though this redox form is believed to be unstable in these conditions, suggesting that thermodynamic equilibrium was not reached. Discussion Weak complexation by NOM was observed, and the initial form of [PtIVCl6]2− persisted. However, the presence of NOM resulted in the formation of additional Pt inorganic species. These unidentified peaks, which were relatively more abundant at high NOM levels, were interpreted as intermediate species between [PtIVCl6]2− and Pt–MON complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".