MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411787723 · doi:10.1002/adsr.202500049

Label‐Free, Sensitive, and Direct Detection of Cardiac Troponin Biomarkers Using Frequency‐Locked Microring Resonators

2025· article· en· W4411787723 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Evan Diamandikos, Tetsuya Shimogaki, Crispin Szydzik, Peter Thurgood, Sonya Palmer, Guanghui Ren, Thach G. Nguyen, César S. Huertas, Arnan Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Sensor Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRMIT UniversityAustralian GovernmentOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and ForestryAustralian National Fabrication Facility
KeywordsResonatorTroponin IOptoelectronicsCardiologyMaterials scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Silicon photonic microring resonators have emerged as promising sensors for Point‐of‐Care applications, where the readout of one or many biomarkers at once is required. In the context of rapid heart attack detection, a limit of detection reaching an ultra‐low concentration of biomarkers is needed, however, such sensors are prone to fundamental noise influence in optical systems which can potentially jeopardize sensor readings. While noise reduction has previously been explored with the Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) technique, its full implementation in microring biosensors has not been realized due to the complexity of the setup. Recent innovations in photonic integration and compatibility with MEMS structures have sparked new interest in validating PDH's potential to be used with chip‐scale sensors. By enabling the signal readout of microrings through their phase response, instead of power transmission, the impact of optical noise can be greatly reduced. This study explores a proof‐of‐concept for this system against the cardiac troponin biomarker, demonstrating the sensor's capacity for selective measurement down to a limit of 10 ng mL −1 while using frequency locking. An improved limit of detection for this system is achieved, down to 5.03 × 10 −7 RIU, which is two orders of magnitude improved compared to the equivalent sensing based on intensity alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Sensor ResearchSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207