Current Trends and Perspectives in the Interpretation and Reception of the Second Vatican Council (1962‒1965)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Benedict XVI’s speech to the members of the Roman Curia in 2005 on the “hermeneutics of reform” sparked new interest in the theological interpretation of the Second Vatican Council (1962‒1965) in the Catholic Church. The main purpose of the text is to present the most significant interpretive currents of the 21st Ecumenical Council in the last twenty years, which emerge as acritical evaluation and appropriation of the call for a“hermeneutic of reform”. The article further explores the topic of the reception of the Second Vatican Council, especially concerning the generative (creative) reception of the conciliar work since the beginning of the pontificate of Pope Francis. It also aims at indicating the main lines of conciliar reception in the time of Pope Francis through the theological neologism of synodality and synodal renewal of the Catholic Church. This is reflected in recent years both in the field of theology and in the life of the entire Catholic Church, as an issue under issues of the future shape of the Catholic Church.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.033 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".