MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411792990 · doi:10.18280/ts.420340

Investigate Schizophrenia Classification Based on EEG Electrode Reduction Using Machine Learning Techniques

2025· article· en· W4411792990 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Athar Al-azzawi, Osman Nuri Uçan

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReduction (mathematics)ElectroencephalographySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Computer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)ElectrodeMachine learningSpeech recognitionPsychologyNeuroscienceChemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schizophrenia is a mental disorder condition that causes patients to become distracted from reality.Over time, the patient loses his cognitive and social abilities to communicate with the outside world.Due to machine learning's strong ability to analyze complicated brain data, it has become an increasingly important tool in recent years.This study considers the brain's neurologic signals in the resting state in two scenarios to classify schizophrenia disease by electroencephalography (EEG).The performed scenarios were to investigate the impact of selecting electrodes randomly (5 electrodes and 8 electrodes) and comparing it with applying the principal component analysis (PCA), utilizing four algorithms to extract features: Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), Approximate Entropy (ApEn), Log Energy Entropy (LogEn), and Shannon Entropy (ShnEn).We used publicly available datasets with 19 EEG channels consisting of two classes, which are schizophrenia and health control, using a onesecond epoch window size.We applied a band-pass filter to decompose the EEG signals into five sub-bands.Also, the L2-normalization method has been applied to the derived features, which positively impacted the outcomes.The features were applied to three classifiers named K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA).From all the scenarios, the five-electrode with random selection showed remarkable results of 99% using the SVM classifier in all evaluation metrics with LogEn+ Bandpass features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signal→Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces→French-language works237,207→