MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411793005 · doi:10.18280/ts.420346

A Novel DenseNet Framework for Brain Tumor Classification Enhanced by XgBoost and Fire Hawk Optimization

2025· article· en· W4411793005 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jeyalakshmi Gangadharan

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, Brain tumours are the most crucial disease that is spreading rapidly all around the world.According to the statistics, more than a thousand people are losing their lives to this tumour in every country.The early prediction of tumours can help to diagnose and overcome the disease quickly.For an earlier prediction, there are Numerous research techniques like deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) models used for feature extraction and classification.In some cases, the hybrid models are also used for feature extraction and classification.However, the accuracy is not attained up to the level of satisfaction for various tumours like Glioma, pituitary, and meningioma.We propose a novel DenseNet architecture incorporating Self-Calibrated Squeeze-and-Excitation (SC-SE) for enhanced feature extraction and representation.The SC-SE DenseNet integrates SC Convolutions (SC-Conv) and SE Blocks within a DenseNet framework.SC-Conv dynamically recalibrates both spatial and channel-wise features, which improves the model's ability to adapt to diverse input variations.SE blocks are used to concentrate important channels for better feature learning.The extracted features from SC-SE DenseNet are classified using the XGBoost classifier.To further optimize performance, the Fire Hawk Optimizer (FHO) is used for feature selection and hyperparameter tuning.FHO aids in selecting the most relevant features from the input image and reduces dimensionality.Additionally, FHO is used to fine-tune the parameters of the XGBoost classifier to increase the classification accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207