MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411793859 · doi:10.2987/25-7223

THE PRESENCE OF AEDES HENDERSONI IN MEXICO

2025· article· en· W4411793859 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aldo I. Ortega‐Morales, Jorge J. Rodríguez‐Rojas, Nadia A. Fernández‐Santos, Miguel Medrano-Santillana, Yuri Ayala-Sulca, Wilfredo Arque-Chunga, Percy Colos-Galindo, Natalia B. Ortega-Morales, Isaías López-Hernández, Mario A. Rodríguez‐Pérez

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Mosquito Control Association · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubgenusBiologyGenBankAedesVector (molecular biology)Aedes aegyptiDNA barcodingAedes albopictusZoologyTaxonomy (biology)BotanyLarvaGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mosquito species commonly named Henderson American pointy mosquito, Aedes hendersoni, was found during a routine mosquito vector surveillance from 2020 to 2023 in diverse collection sites with conserved forested vegetation at the Eco-Parks Rincón de la Silla and El Salto in Nuevo León, northeastern Mexico. Collected specimens were labeled, mounted, and identified using taxonomic keys. Further confirmation of Ae. hendersoni was performed by deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) barcoding and cytochrome oxidase-I (COI) sequences served to confirm the identity of Ae. hendersoni by comparison with other sequences of species with Triseriatus group and Protomacleaya subgenus of Aedes. Voucher specimens were curated and are available in 2 Mexican collection repositories and COI sequences were deposited in the NCBI GenBank with accession number MG242473.1. Hence, the presence of Ae. hendersoni in México is documented for the first time. Now, geographic occurrence of this species is from Canada throughout United States to northeastern México. With this new record, there are the 4 mosquito species in the Triseriatus group [Aedes: (Protomacleaya)] and 252 species in México.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Mosquito Control AssociationSame topicMosquito-borne diseases and controlFrench-language works237,207