MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411799044 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3584277

Centralized Task Allocation for Multiple UAVs in Time-Constraint Industrial IoT Operations

2025· article· en· W4411799044 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamad Abou Houran, Gautam Srivastava, Jawad Mirza, Ali Ranjha, Muhammad Awais Javed, Muhammad Hamza Zafar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTask (project management)Constraint (computer-aided design)Time constraintInternet of ThingsResource allocationComputer networkDistributed computingReal-time computingComputer securityEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The industrial Internet of Things (IoT) allows real-time monitoring and operational efficiency by enabling automated processes in industrial environments. In this paper, we propose a centralized task assignment framework for industrial IoT scenarios, focusing on light cargo delivery to specific locations via Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). The task assignment problem is formulated as a Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP) with the objective of minimizing the maximum route distance among all UAVs. To solve CVRP, we employ a learning-based approach using an Attention Model (AM), which utilizes a deep learning framework with an encoder-decoder architecture to generate optimized UAV routes while satisfying the capacity constraints of UAVs. The AM is trained using policy gradient reinforcement learning to ensure that the solutions are both efficient and scalable. Numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the AM-based framework in delivering solutions that minimize the maximum tour length for deliveries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.461

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207