MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Optimizing Deep Learning Models for Real-Time Seizure Detection Based on Electroencephalogram

2025· article· en· W4411800199 on OpenAlexafffund
Hadrien T. Gayap, Moulay A. Akhloufi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
FundersCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceElectroencephalographyDeep learningArtificial intelligenceEpileptic seizureMachine learningPsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate and real-time seizure detection is crucial for epilepsy management. Deep learning offers promising solutions, but optimal performance in clinical settings requires efficient and accurate models. This paper focuses on optimizing deep learning models for real-time seizure detection from EEG signals. We evaluate and optimize various architectures on the TUH Seizure dataset, focusing on combining model and architecture in order to leverage strengths, hyperparameter tuning and feature extraction. Our optimized MobileNEp (Mobile Network for Epilepsy) model demonstrates superior efficiency and general seizure detection, reaching an AUC of 0.9363. Optimized Transformers models show better specialization for specific seizure types, achieving AUCs of 0.987 for absence and 0.991 for tonic-clonic seizures. This research highlights the importance of model optimization in developing effective deep learning tools for real-time EEG seizure detection in clinical settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces→French-language works237,207→