MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411801327 · doi:10.3390/jcm14134559

Sina Score as a New Machine Learning-Derived Online Prediction Model of Mortality for Cirrhotic Patients Awaiting Liver Transplantation: A Prospective Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4411801327 on OpenAlexaff
Seyed Mohammad Kazem Hosseini Asl, Seyed Jalil Masoumi, Ghazaleh Rashidizadeh, Amir Hossein Hassani, Golnoush Mehrabani, Vahid Ebrahimi, Seyed Ali Malek-Hosseini, Saman Nikeghbalian, Alireza Shakibafard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersShiraz University of Medical Sciences
KeywordsMedicineCirrhosisModel for End-Stage Liver DiseaseLogistic regressionLiver diseaseInternal medicineLiver transplantationCohortTransplantationMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cirrhosis is responsible for a large proportion of mortality worldwide. Despite having multiple scoring systems, organ allocation for end-stage liver disease remains a major problem. Since anthropometric indices play important roles in predicting the prognosis of patients with cirrhosis, these variables were used in establishment of a novel scoring system. Methods: In order to evaluate a machine learning approach for predicting the probability of three-month mortality in cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation, the clinical and anthropometric information of 64 patients referred to Abu-Ali-Sina Transplantation Center were collected and followed for three months. A LASSO logistic regression model was used to devise and validate a new machine learning approach and compare it to the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) regarding the three-month mortality of cirrhotic patients. Hand grip, skeletal muscle mass index, average mean arterial pressure, serum sodium, and total bilirubin were assessed with this new machine learning approach to predict the prognosis of patients with cirrhosis, which we named the Sina score. Results: Sixty-four patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 46.50 ± 12.871 years. Like the MELD score, the Sina score is a precise prognostic tool for predicting the three-month mortality probability in cirrhotic patients [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.753 and p = 0.005 vs. AUC = 0.607 and p = 0.238]. Our machine learning approach, the Sina score, was shown to be a precise prognostic tool, like the MELD, for the prediction of the three-month mortality probability of cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation. Conclusions: The Sina score, given that its level of precision is on par with the MELD, can be recommended for the prediction of three-month mortality in cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Medicine→Same topicLiver Disease and Transplantation→French-language works237,207→