A Band-Stop Filter-Based LQR Control Method for Semi-Active Seat Suspension to Mitigate Motion Sickness
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study proposes a novel control framework for semi-active seat suspensions, specifically targeting motion sickness mitigation through precision suppression of vertical vibrations within the 0.1–0.5 Hz frequency range. Firstly, a fractional-order band-stop filter in conjunction with a linear quadratic regulator (LQR) controller under frequency-domain sensitivity constraints (0.1–0.5 Hz) is proposed to achieve frequency-selective vibration attenuation. Secondly, the multi-objective butterfly optimization algorithm (MOBOA) is adopted to optimize the LQR controller’s weighting matrices (Q, R) by balancing conflicting requirements in terms of human body displacement limits, acceleration thresholds, and suspension travel. Finally, experimental validation under concrete pavement excitation and random road profiles demonstrates significant advantages over conventional LQR, i.e., a 41.04% reduction in vertical vibration amplitude and a 55.95% suppression of acceleration peaks within the target frequency band. The combined enhancements offer dual benefits of enhancing ride comfort and motion sickness mitigation in real-world driving scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it