MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411801544 · doi:10.59236/td2007vol1iss2735

Knowledges Exchange as a Framework for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

2007· article· en· W4411801544 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransformative Dialogues Teaching and Learning Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEvaluation of Teaching Practices
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipSociologyMathematics educationPsychologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In western society, the so-called traditional education system is based on an Industrial Age model that was developed several hundred years ago.At that time, its purpose was to provide mass education, with a focus on teaching the "3 Rs" to children and youth as preparation for running factory machinery.Society has moved beyond the Industrial Age, yet the same educational paradigms persist.This essay is founded on the proposition that a new framework for education is needed for the 21 st century, based on the concept of Knowledges Exchange.By posing a series of questions, and exploring some of the possible answers, it is hoped that educators will be encouraged to re-consider some of the existing norms of the education system, and adopt alternative approaches in their practice.Those who want to engage in discussion about the issues raised here may wish to contribute to Elizabeth's blog at:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.075
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0750.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0110.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it