MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411801881 · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004130

Prevalence and associated factors of mental and substance use problems among adults in Kenya: A community-based cross-sectional study

2025· article· en· W4411801881 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Patrick N. Mwangala, Anita Kerubo, Millicent Makandi, Rachael Odhiambo, Amina Abubakar

Bibliographic record

VenuePLOS Global Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGlobal Affairs CanadaWellcome Trust
KeywordsAnxietyMedicineCross-sectional studyMental healthPsychiatryLogistic regressionAlcohol Use Disorders Identification TestEnvironmental healthPoison controlInjury preventionInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data on the burden and determinants of mental and substance use problems among women in urban and rural informal settlements in Kenya is sparse, thus limiting preventive and treatment efforts in these areas. To bridge the gap, we (a) determined the prevalence of depressive, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and alcohol and drug use problems among women compared to their spouses and (b) examined the correlates of these outcomes. Data collection for this cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2022 in Mombasa, Kwale and Nairobi counties in Kenya. A total of 1528 adults (1048 women) took part. The 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire, 7-Item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, and Drug Use Disorders Identification Test were administered alongside other measures. Logistic regression was used to examine the correlates of mental and substance use problems. Overall, the prevalence of mental and substance use problems among women and men respectively was 28% (95% CI 25, 31%) vs 22% (95% CI 18, 26%) [depressive symptoms], 12% (95% CI 10, 14%) vs 8% (95% CI 6, 11%) [general anxiety symptoms], 22% (95% CI 19, 24%) vs 21% (95% CI 17, 25%) [PTSD symptoms], 4% (95% CI 3, 5%) vs 15% (95% CI 12, 19%) [alcohol use problems], and 2% (95% CI 1, 3%) vs 12% (95% CI 9, 15%) [drug use problems]. The prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms was significantly higher among women compared to their male counterparts. On the other hand, both current and past-year alcohol and drug use were significantly higher in men than women. Among women, stressful life events, urban residence, food insecurity, family debt, unemployment, poor self-rated health, poor eyesight, and higher educational level were the correlates for elevated depressive, anxiety and PTSD symptoms. Conversely, sexual abuse, living in rented houses, urban residence, verbal abuse, stressful life events, and somatic complaints were the correlates for depressive, anxiety and PTSD symptoms in men. Correlates against mental health problems included social support, higher subjective wellbeing, older age (>50 years), increased vigorous exercise and higher household income (in both sexes). Correlates for current alcohol use in women included stressful life events, urban residence, being sexually active, and living in a single family. Among men, higher household income was associated with current alcohol use. Correlates against current alcohol use included being married, living in a larger household (>5), being a Muslim and having multimorbidity (in both sexes). Correlates for current drug use included unemployment and sexual abuse. Female sex was associated with reduced odds of current drug use. The prevalence of depressive, anxiety and PTSD symptoms, and alcohol use problems is high in the study setting. However, needs vary by gender and study location, highlighting the importance of targeted approaches in mental health services. Our results also highlight the need for integrating mental health services into existing primary care as well as testing and scaling multi-component mental health interventions in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLOS Global Public HealthSame topicMental Health Treatment and AccessFrench-language works237,207