Integrating the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Contextual Factors and a Trauma Lens to Inform Speech-Language Pathologists' Practice With Children and Families
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: This article highlights how the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework aligns with a trauma lens in speech-language pathology practice by considering risk and protective factors in a client's life and within clinical care interactions at individual, family, and community and population levels. This approach shifts practitioners from a traditional biomedical model to a holistic biopsychosocial model that considers the needs, strengths, and priorities of family members, in alignment with shifts in the field. Appropriate models of service delivery, the application of trauma-informed principles, and the need for changing systems and policies to promote equity in services are also discussed. CONCLUSIONS: By addressing both personal and environmental contextual factors, speech-language pathologists can better understand and support their clients' unique experiences and needs. This comprehensive understanding fosters a more inclusive, effective, and compassionate practice, ultimately enhancing the overall well-being and outcomes of clients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it