Entrevista com o professor Henry Giroux: esperança em meio à crise do neoliberalismo e à ascensão do neofascismo - perspectivas contra-hegemônicas para a educação democrática
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A entrevista com o Professor Henry Giroux explora sua trajetória intelectual no campo da pedagogia crítica, destacando sua defesa da educação democrática como ferramenta de transformação social. Reconhecido por analisar os impactos do neoliberalismo e da ascensão do neofascismo, Giroux propõe uma pedagogia da resistência fundamentada em epistemologias críticas e no papel dos professores como agentes de mudança. A conversa aprofunda estratégias para enfrentar o autoritarismo, combater as desigualdades e reconstruir projetos democráticos por meio da educação. Nesse contexto de retrocessos globais, surge a seguinte questão: como podemos continuar cultivando a esperança como um ato político e pedagógico de resistência e reinvenção da democracia?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".