Student-Led Development of an Elective Course: Cultural Competency and Humility in Veterinary Medicine
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the growth of veterinary medicine and acknowledgment of the lack of diversity in the profession, it is necessary to educate future generations on the importance and growth of diversity, equity, and inclusion. However, few courses in the veterinary curriculum address this need. To fulfill such a need for one U.S. veterinary program, a veterinary student was mentored by faculty and staff to develop an elective course focused on cultural competency and humility in veterinary medicine. Through self-directed learning to design a course aimed at advancing veterinary students' knowledge of diversity, equity, and inclusion, the student progressed his knowledge of the topic while also being exposed to the logistical aspects of course design and potential as a future educator. The resulting student-driven, flipped classroom strategy yielded a positive discussion-based learning experience for its first student cohort and goals for its growth as a professional education course.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it