AutoPM3: enhancing variant interpretation via LLM-driven PM3 evidence extraction from scientific literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Rare diseases affect over 300 million people worldwide and are often caused by genetic variants. While variant detection has become cost-effective, interpreting these variants-particularly collecting literature-based evidence like ACMG/AMP PM3-remains complex and time-consuming. RESULTS: We present AutoPM3, a method that automates PM3 evidence extraction from literatures using open-source large language models (LLMs). AutoPM3 combines a Text2SQL-based variant extractor and a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) module, enhanced by a variant-specific retriever and fine-tuned LLM, to separately process tables and text. We curated PM3-Bench, a dataset of 1027 variant-publication evidence pairs from ClinGen. On openly accessible pairs, AutoPM3 achieved 86.1% accuracy for variant hits and 72.5% recall for in trans variants-outperforming other methods, including those using larger models. We uncovered the effectiveness of AutoPM3's key modules, especially for variant-specific retriever and Text2SQL, through the sequential ablation study. AutoPM3 located evidence in 76 s, demonstrating that open-source LLMs can offer an efficient, cost-effective solution for rare disease diagnosis. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: AutoPM3 is implemented and freely available under the MIT license at https://github.com/HKU-BAL/AutoPM3.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".