MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411804274 · doi:10.17269/s41997-025-01074-w

The role of trust in engaging community-based task forces and agencies among minoritized communities during a public health emergency

2025· article· en· W4411804274 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Denessia Blake-Hepburn, Kadidiatou Kadio, Subrana Rahman, M. Hashim Khan, Samiya Abdi, Shaza A. Fadel, Sara Allin, Anushka Ataullahjan, Erica Di Ruggiero

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoPublic Health Ontario
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research CouncilSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Mental Health Association
KeywordsOutreachPublic relationsThematic analysisPromotion (chess)Focus groupInterpersonal communicationOnline communitySocial mediaPsychologyQualitative researchPolitical scienceSocial psychologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To investigate how task forces, networks, and community agencies engaged with faith-based, and ethnoracial communities to improve vaccine confidence and uptake of COVID-19 vaccines, and to understand the perceived enablers and barriers to the implementation of vaccine confidence and uptake in the Peel Region and Toronto, Ontario. METHODS: Between June 2023 and March 2024, we conducted ten online focus groups with three task forces and six community agencies. We conducted four interviews with representatives from two task forces and one network. We used thematic analysis to explore respondents' perceptions and experiences. RESULTS: The data revealed that trust operated at interpersonal and organizational levels, which are mutually reinforcing. At the interpersonal level, members of the task forces, network, and ambassadors from community agencies drew on relationships with members of minoritized communities by addressing community concerns on their terms and using in-person, online, regular contact, and active listening approaches. At the organizational level, trust was facilitated through conducting outreach (i.e., vaccine promotion) at trusted and familiar locations (e.g., faith-based organizations). COVID-related information was better received from community representatives who were already known and trusted among community members. Common outreach strategies included door-to-door outreach; informational videos and sessions; mass awareness-raising campaigns; townhalls; and ethnic media and social media. CONCLUSION: Community leaders play an instrumental role in establishing and sustaining trust in vaccine promotion among community members. Trust established among community leaders and ambassadors enabled vaccine promotion efforts among minoritized communities. These findings may help to further strengthen community engagement for future public health emergency responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Public Health→Same topicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy→French-language works237,207→