MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411806476 · doi:10.5194/ems2025-110

Diversity of climatic and bioclimatic conditions during the second International Polar Year (1932-1933) in northern Canada

2025· preprint· en· W4411806476 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrzej Araźny, Konrad Chmist, Rajmund Przybylak, Przemysław Wyszyński, G. P. Singh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPolar Research and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiversity (politics)GeographyPolarClimatologyPhysical geographyClimate changeEcologyEnvironmental scienceGeologyBiologyPolitical sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

International Polar Years (IPY) are a series of scientific and research expeditions organised and coordinated by the International Council for Science and the World Meteorological Organization, during which information is collected on the Earth's polar regions. The research has demonstrated the key importance of polar regions in shaping weather and climate at lower latitudes.This paper presents the diversity of climatic and bioclimatic conditions during the second IPY (1932-33) in northern Canada. These conditions are presented for the Coppermine, Chesterfield, Cope Hope Advance, Nain and Makkovik stations. The material (air temperature and wind speed) used for the times of the second IPY comes from the Canadian Polar Year (1940) for the first three above-mentioned stations and from Climate Data (2022) for the remaining two. The meteorological measurements in Nain and Makkovik were taken by Moravian Missionaries who conducted religious missions in this area. The historical results during the second IPY were compared with the reference period (1991–2020) from contemporary meteorological stations (Kugluktuk, Chesterfield, Kangirsuk and Nain). Data for the modern period come from Historical Climate Data, Government of Canada https://climate.weather.gc.ca/.The study analysed two biometeorological indexes: wind chill temperature (WCT) and predicted clothing insulation (Iclp). Apparent cold and the extent of frostbite risk to the human body were assessed using the WCT. On the other hand, the thermal insulation of clothing required for a person to maintain thermal equilibrium in a given set of meteorological conditions was estimated using the Iclp index. Both biometeorological indices were calculated using BioKlima 2.6 software (https://www.igipz.pan.pl/bioklima-crd.html).The work was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland, project No. 2020/39/B/ST10/00653. Reference:Climate Data from the Overseas Stations of the Deutsche Seewarte (German Marine Observatory) in Canada, 2022, DWD, Marine Climate Monitoring, Hamburg.Canadian Polar Year Expeditions 1932-33, Meteorology, 1940, Division of Meteorological Services of Canada, Volume I, Ottawa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.149

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPolar Research and EcologyFrench-language works237,207