Delineating Soil Management Zones for Site-Specific Nutrient Management in Cocoa Cultivation Areas with a Long History of Pesticide Usage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Delineating soil management zones in cocoa cultivation areas can help optimize production and minimize ecological and environmental risks. This research assessed the spatial distribution of heavy metal concentration and soil fertility indicators in Cross River State, Nigeria, to delineate soil management zones (MZs). A total of n = 63 georeferenced, composite soil samples were collected at the 0–30 cm depth increment, air-dried, and subjected to physicochemical analysis. The soil data were subjected to principal component analysis (PCA), and the selected principal components (PCs) were used for fuzzy c-means clustering analysis to delineate the MZs. The result indicated that soil pH varied from 4.8 (strongly acidic) to 6.3 (slightly acidic), with high average organic carbon contents. The degree of contamination was low, while the ecological risk indicator (RI) of the environment under cocoa cultivation ranged from low risk (RI = 18.24) to moderate risk (RI = 287.15), with moderate risk areas mostly found in patches around the central and upper regions. Higher pH was associated with increased levels of exchangeable Ca, Mg, and K, and TN and OC. Strong spatial dependence was observed for silt, pH, OC, Mg, Zn, Cu, Pb, Cd, Cr, and DC. The result showed the first six principal components (PCs) with eigenvalues >1 accounting for 83.33% of the cumulative variance, and three MZs were derived via the selected six PCs using fuzzy c-means clustering analysis. The results of this study further indicated that MZ3 had the highest pH (6.06), TN (0.24%), OC (2.79%), exchangeable Ca (10.62 cmol/kg), Mg (4.01 cmol/kg), and K (0.12 cmol/kg). These were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those observed in MZ2 and MZ1, and they represent the most fertile parts of the study area. Furthermore, 40.6% of the study area had marginal soil (i.e., soil under MZ2).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".