INTEGRASI KAWASAN PARIWISATA KOTAWARINGIN BARAT, SUKAMARA, DAN LAMANDAU (KOBARSULAM) MELALUI PENGEMBANGAN JALUR WISATA TEMATIK
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pariwisata yang dibangun di Kawasan Kotawaringin Barat, Sukamara dan Lamandau (Kobarsulam) saat ini belum dilakukan secara terintegrasi dan saling mendukung. Kotawaringin Barat sebagai pintu masuk wisatawan dan destinasi pariwisata utama kawasan belum mampu menyebarkan kunjungan wisatawan dan manfaat pariwisata yang dimilikinya ke daerah sekitarnya. Upaya untuk mengintegrasikan pembangunan pariwisata di Kobarsulam harus melibatkan seluruh pemangku kepentingan pariwisata yang ada. Salah satu strategi yang dapat didorong dalam membangun integrasi pariwisata di Kobarsulam adalah dengan mengembangkan jalur wisata yang mengaitkan tema serta cerita berbagai daya tarik wisata yang ada di seluruh kawasan. Berdasarkan kajian sekurang-kurangnya ada sembilan jalur wisata tematik yang dapat dikembangkan, yaitu jalur wisata tematik Bertamu ke Rumah Orang Utan Kalimantan, Susur Sungai Kalimantan, Jejak Sejarah Kesultanan Kutaringin, Eksotisme Budaya Dayak, Jelajah Peradaban Pesisir Selatan Kalimantan, Even Pariwisata, Jelajah Hutan Tropis Kalimantan, Rekreasi Air, dan Kuliner Khas Kobarsulam.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".