„Trwać w dialogu z wątpliwościami i nieznanym...”. Nowy wymiar teatru tańca na przykładzie twórczości Crystal Pite i Kidd Pivot
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article is an attempt to examine the phenomenon of Crystal Pite as an artist who, in close collaboration with Jonathon Young, creates performances for the Vancouver-based company Kidd Pivot, which contemporary critics have de-scribed as a hybrid that stretches the boundaries of theatre and dance, placing her among the most important representatives of contemporary dance theatre. Reconstructing Pite's artistic biography and emphasising its most important stages, as well as following the findings of the dancer and choreographer Robert Desrosiers and the literary critic and dance researcher Peter Dickinson, the au-thor analyses two of the three most recent artistic productions created by the Pite-Young duo for Kidd Pivot, which exemplify their shared fascination with narrative dance theatre and language as a system of signs, which in the creative process is ‘rewritten’ into a bodily dimension and choreography. All this, com-bined with the emotional layer of the Vancouver company's performances, cre-ates an innovative and unusual quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it