MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411840265 · doi:10.1093/ibd/izaf128

Unraveling Genetic Versus Environmental Factors Determining Disease Course in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Population-Based Cohort Study in First- and Second-Generation Immigrants

2025· article· en· W4411840265 on OpenAlexaff
Anna-Teresa D’Hooghe, Gry Poulsen, Christian Nikolai Sørensen, Parul Tandon, Nynne Nyboe Andersen, Séverine Vermeire, Bram Verstockt, Tine Jess

Bibliographic record

VenueInflammatory Bowel Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersKU LeuvenDanmarks Grundforskningsfond
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioInflammatory bowel diseaseUlcerative colitisCohortInternal medicineProportional hazards modelIncidence (geometry)Cohort studyPopulationConfidence intervalCrohn's diseaseDiseaseEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) incidence in immigrants approximates that of the host country in progressive generations but less is known about their disease outcome. We investigate how the immigrant generation affects IBD outcomes. METHODS: In this population-based cohort study, the risks of first IBD-related hospitalization, first IBD-related surgery, need for advanced therapies, and perianal disease were compared between first- and second-generation immigrants (stratified into Western/non-Western) and native Danes, using Cox proportional hazard regression to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs), correcting for sex, age at IBD diagnosis, and calendar year of IBD diagnosis. RESULTS: First-generation immigrants had lower risk of IBD-related surgery (aHRWestern 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.05, aHRnon-Western 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.92) and advanced therapy (aHRWestern 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.99, aHRnon-Western 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94) than native Danes, whereas second-generation immigrants resembled native Danes. However, second-generation immigrants had higher risk of hospitalization than native Danes (aHRWestern 1.28; 95% CI, 1.05-1.55, aHRnon-Western 1.40; 95% CI, 1.28-1.54), whereas in first-generation immigrants this was only observed in non-Western ulcerative colitis patients (aHR 1.19; 95% CI, 1.08-1.32). Across both generations, non-Western immigrants had higher risk of perianal disease (Crohn's disease: aHRfirst-generation 1.55; 95% CI, 1.25-1.92; aHRsecond-generation 1.58; 95% CI, 1.25-2.01). CONCLUSIONS: Disease outcomes change across immigrant generations, pointing to environmental factors possibly impacting disease course, which needs further investigation. In contrast, non-Western immigrants were shown to have more perianal disease in both generations, suggesting a genetic susceptibility for this debilitating phenotype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInflammatory Bowel DiseasesSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207