Serum multi-trace elements and post-stroke cognitive impairment: a prospective observational cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) significantly affects stroke survivors. Identifying modifiable risk factors for PSCI is essential. Serum multi-trace elements are crucial for neurological function but vary in concentration among older adults. It remains unclear whether increasing multi-trace elements can reduce the incidence of PSCI. We investigated the associations between baseline serum multi-trace elements and PSCI. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment defined PSCI. We used logistic regression analyses to evaluate the association between serum multi-trace elements and PSCI. Subsequently, we assessed the associations between serum multi-trace elements and three different cognitive domains using the Kruskal-Wallis test. We further evaluated improvements in the predictive ability of serum multi-trace elements. Finally, 626 patients (mean age: 62.85 ± 7.54 years) were followed up for a median of 1.2 years. Lower concentrations of serum iron (odds ratio [OR] = 2.498, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.505-4.145) and zinc (OR = 2.015, 95% CI: 1.233-3.293) were associated with a higher PSCI risk. Higher concentrations of serum iron (OR = 0.368, 95% CI: 0.227-0.595) and magnesium (OR = 0.273, 95% CI: 0.164-0.454), along with lower concentrations of serum copper (OR = 0.544, 95% CI: 0.34-0.872), were significantly correlated with a lower PSCI risk. Cognitive impairments varied across multi-trace elements. Serum iron affected wider cognition, while magnesium and copper levels were strongly associated with language and executive function. Adding serum multi-trace elements to the conventional model improved PSCI risk reclassification (area under curve: 0.676-0.718). Multi-trace elements may influence PSCI progression. This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/ ; unique identifier: ChiCTR1900022675).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".