MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Complete Factorial Design for Optimization of Operating Conditions for a Nanofiltration 90 Polymeric Membrane Treating High Concentration Sulfated Waters and Modeling Using Machine Learning

2025· preprint· en· W4411855376 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePreprints.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInternet of Things and AI
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanofiltrationFactorial experimentFractional factorial designFactorialSulfationMembraneChromatographyBox–Behnken designComputer scienceChemical engineeringProcess engineeringChemistryResponse surface methodologyMathematicsEngineeringMachine learningBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the prairie provinces of Western Canada, including Saskatchewan, many farms lack access to potable, healthy water and rely on dugouts for their water supply. Dugouts are artificial ponds or reservoirs that collect and store water, often from rain or snowmelt, for agricultural and livestock use. Dugouts contain, in some cases, high sulfate con-taminants that impact livestock watering. To clean these kinds of waters, a full factorial design study with eleven experiments was carried out to evaluate and optimize key nanofiltration membrane operating conditions, such as Trans-Membrane Pressure (TMP), Crossflow Velocity (CVF), and magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) concentration, fo-cusing on their impact on rejection rates and permeate flux. With optimal conditions of a TMP of 9 bar and a CFV of 0.65 m/s, the nanofiltration (NF90) membrane achieved a sulfate rejection of 90% and a permeate flux of 127 LMH, with CFV identified as the most significant factor influencing the operation of the membrane at all concentrations. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) confirmed the statistical significance of the polynomial regression models, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The membrane's rejection data and flux regression models yield a strong fit to the data, with a correlation coefficient exceeding 99%. Using the experimental dataset, two machine learning algorithms— Decision Tree (DT) and Random Forest (RF) — were employed to predict the permeate flux. The RF model demonstrated excellent predictive performance across all data sets, achieving a root mean square error (RMSE) of 3.98 and a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.99. These findings highlight the potential of machine learning for predicting effec-tive sulphated water treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it