MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411859586 · doi:10.1016/j.premed.2025.100010

Precision medicine: Crossing the biomedical scales with AI

2025· article· en· W4411859586 on OpenAlexaff
Sharat Israni, Gary D. Bader, Sergio E. Baranzini, John A. Capra, Marina Sirota, Christina V. Theodoris, Chun Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Precision Medicine Health and Disease · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPrecision medicineComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceData scienceMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Precision Medicine, targeted for each person, has presented a major challenge in scaling up to wide use. Reflecting the true behavior of the human body, it requires inquiry across the biomedical scales, from the genome all the way up to the environmental factors impinging on that person. In computation terms, this is a problem of unprecedented complexity. With AI showing its potential, the thoughtful application of advanced machine intelligence, knowledge networks, machine reasoning power and new computational paradigms—guided by human oversight at every stage—can help unlock major advances in treatment and prevention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Precision Medicine Health and DiseaseSame topicHealth, Environment, Cognitive AgingFrench-language works237,207