Irena Szumilewicz-Lachman. Contra el tiempo, más allá de los límites.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Irena Szumilewicz-Lachman se dedicó a la filosofía de la ciencia, la filosofía de la naturaleza, la metodología de las ciencias naturales y la historia de la ciencia. Investigó el convencionalismo, principalmente basándose en los logros de Henri Poincaré. Sus comentarios y análisis sobre la naturaleza del tiempo, y más ampliamente sobre la filosofía de la cosmología, fueron originales e innovadores, ya que se centraron en la direccionalidad del paso del tiempo. Para ello, Szumilewicz-Lachman destacó el papel que desempeñaban la belleza y la verdad, así como el buen sentido en el método socrático, en la contemplación del tiempo en sí mismo. En otras palabras, todo trabajo e investigación científica se fundamenta en una responsabilidad moral y estética, pues la belleza y la verdad son el fundamento de toda existencia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".