MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411867004 · doi:10.1109/mpel.2025.3560516

The FEPPCON XII Session on High-Power Converters

2025· article· en· W4411867004 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Electronics Magazine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Fredericton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSession (web analytics)ConvertersPower (physics)Electrical engineeringComputer scienceReliability engineeringEngineeringPhysicsVoltageWorld Wide WebThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To reduce CO2 emissions, electrification is being promoted not only for new fields of use but also with increased capacity and performance for the existing industrial and power system applications. The trend of increasing power ratings of power electronics converters is evident to serve these applications. Innovations are required in terms of converter topologies, semiconductor devices with higher blocking voltages, fast protection, and condition monitoring features, and from the control algorithms and software performance point of view, as these converters need to interact with the utility grid and other equipment that is already installed. The current and anticipated requirements of these applications from an industrial perspective, along with their implications for future technological advancements, have been discussed at FEPPCON XII.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it