Fluctuation structure predicts genome-wide perturbation outcomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Pooled single-cell perturbation screens represent powerful experimental platforms for functional genomics, yet interpreting these rich datasets for meaningful biological conclusions remains challenging. Most current methods fall at one of two extremes: either opaque deep learning models that obscure biological meaning, or simplified frameworks that treat genes as isolated units. As such, these approaches overlook a crucial insight: gene co-fluctuations in unperturbed cellular states can be harnessed to model perturbation responses. Here we present CIPHER (Covariance Inference for Perturbation and High-dimensional Expression Response), a conceptual framework leveraging ideas from linear response in statistical physics to model transcriptome-wide perturbation outcomes using gene co-fluctuations in unperturbed cells. We validated our approach on synthetic regulatory networks before applying it to 29 large-scale single-cell genetic perturbation datasets covering 19,003 perturbations and over 6.26 M cells. Our work robustly recapitulated genome-wide responses to single and double perturbations by exploiting baseline gene covariance structure. Importantly, eliminating gene-gene covariances, while retaining gene-intrinsic variances, i.e. “mean-field” conditions, dramatically reduced model performance by several folds across multiple metrics, demonstrating the rich information stored within baseline fluctuation structures. Benchmarked against recent deep learning and linear baselines, CIPHER matched or exceeded the best-performing approaches with fitting a single parameter. Moreover, gene-gene correlations transferred successfully across independent studies of the same cell type, revealing stereotypic fluctuation structures. We further extended CIPHER to the inverse problem of identifying true driver perturbations, where it achieved high performance across both genetic and chemical perturbation screens through uncertainty-aware Bayesian inference. We further used CIPHER to nominate drivers of therapy resistance in melanoma and pancreatic cancer, validating its top predictions experimentally. Finally, most genome-wide responses propagated through the covariance matrix along approximately 1-3 independent and global gene modules, consistent with a low-rank structure of the underlying gene regulatory network, which we show can enable the framework’s success. We have also created a package called cipher-perturb , available on PyPI, to apply the framework to any dataset, accompanied by a detailed website ( https://goyallab.github.io/CIPHERWebsite/ ). Our study underscores the importance of theoretically-grounded models in capturing complex biological responses, highlighting fundamental design principles encoded in cellular fluctuation patterns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".