MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411872139 · doi:10.61186/jps.23.142.279

Comparison of the effectiveness of combination therapy based on virtual reality and mindfulness with brief mindfulness training on cognitive emotion regulation and mindfulness among people with panic disorder

2024· article· en· W4411872139 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Parvin Foroughi, Gholamreza Manshaee, Seyed Hamid Atash Pour

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychological Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMindfulnessPsychotherapistPsychologyMindfulness-based cognitive therapyPanic disorderVirtual realityCognitionCognitive therapyClinical psychologyAnxietyPsychiatryComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Panic disorder and panic attacks are two of the most common problems seen in the world of psychiatry.This disorder is not a disease with a good prognosis and can significantly affect the quality of life and lead to depression and inability to perform daily tasks, so new approaches to psychotherapy in the direction of cognitive and emotional problems can be effective.Aims: The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of a combined treatment based on virtual reality and mindfulness with short-term mindfulness intervention on the cognitive regulation of emotion and mindfulness in people with panic disorder.Methods: The present study is applied research and in terms of data collection is a quasiexperimental study with pretest-posttest and 45-day follow-up with the control group.The statistical population of the research was all people with symptoms of panic disorder who referred to the counseling centers of the 6th and 11th districts of Tehran in 1401.The research sample was 45 people, who were selected in a purposeful way and randomly assigned to three groups (15 people in each group).Experimental groups; received combined therapy and short-term mindfulness therapy separately, during 8 sessions, and the control group did not receive intervention.Research tools were cognitive emotion regulation questionnaires (Granofsky and Kraij, 2006) and mindfulness (Toronto, 2006).And the data were analyzed by repeated measurement variance analysis and Bonferroni post hoc test in SPSS23 software.Results: The effectiveness of both the combined treatment of virtual reality and mindfulness and short-term mindfulness intervention in the post-test and follow-up phase was significant in the cognitive regulation of emotion (adaptive and incompatible strategies) and mindfulness.However, the combined treatment in the variable of mindfulness It has been more effective than short-term mindfulness therapy (p< 0.05).Conclusion: According to the results of this study, therapists can use both treatments in psychological interventions to improve the cognitive regulation of emotion and combined therapy to facilitate mindfulness in people with panic disorder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Psychological ScienceSame topicMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsFrench-language works237,207