Association between antithrombotic medications and intracranial hemorrhage among older patients with mild traumatic brain injury: a multicenter cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To measure the association between antithrombotic (AT) medications (anticoagulant and antiplatelet) and risk for traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in older adults with a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study across 103 emergency departments affiliated with a teleradiology company dedicated to emergency imaging between 2020 and 2022. Older adults (≥65 years old) with mTBI, with a head computed tomography scan, were included. Natural language processing models were used to label-free texts of emergency physician forms and radiology reports; and a multivariable logistic regression model to measure the association between AT medications and occurrence of ICH. RESULTS: A total of 5948 patients [median age 84.6 (74.3-89.1) years, 58.1% females] were included, of whom 781 (13.1%) had an ICH. Among them, 3177 (53.4%) patients were treated with at least one AT agent. No AT medication was associated with a higher risk for ICH: antiplatelet odds ratio 0.98 95% confidence interval (0.81-1.18), direct oral anticoagulant 0.82 (0.60-1.09), and vitamin K antagonist 0.66 (0.37-1.10). Conversely, a high-level fall [1.68 (1.15-2.4)], a Glasgow coma scale of 14 [1.83 (1.22-2.68)], a cutaneous head impact [1.5 (1.17-1.92)], vomiting [1.59 (1.18-2.14)], amnesia [1.35 (1.02-1.79)], a suspected skull vault fracture [9.3 (14.2-26.5)] or of facial bones fracture [1.34 (1.02-1.75)] were associated with a higher risk for ICH. CONCLUSION: This study found no association between AT medications and an increased risk of ICH among older patients with mTBI suggesting that routine neuroimaging in this population may offer limited benefit and that additional variables should be considered in the imaging decision.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".