MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411874386 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-08339-x

Kronecker convolutional feature pyramid for fault diagnosis in rolling bearings

2025· article· en· W4411874386 on OpenAlexaff
Sadia Batool, A. Abid, Muhammad Asif, Sagheer Abbas, Asghar Ali Shah, Taher M. Ghazal

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeature (linguistics)Kronecker deltaPyramid (geometry)Computer scienceFault (geology)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsGeologyGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rolling bearings play a significant role in rotating machinery. Due to the failure of these components, the operations of the whole machinery are compromised and get out of service, which ultimately causes significant workload overhead and monetary loss. Many techniques are proposed for the diagnosis of faults in the rolling bearing; these techniques are manual and require a large amount of time for identification and correction of faults, which is not suitable for routine maintenance and operability of this rotating machinery. Therefore, there is a need for promising techniques for autonomous and reliable fault diagnosis in rolling bearings. Furthermore, the proposed deep learning model for fault diagnosis is not able to provide efficient and reliable results and is vulnerable to degradation problems and lack of multi-scale feature extraction. This proposed model faces the issue of the degradation problem due to the disappearance of the gradient, which ultimately compromises the optimization process. To solve these issues above, the authors proposed a novel three-dimensional (3D) Kronecker convolution feature pyramid (KCFP), which efficiently inputs the acquired data without converting time-frequency domain and pixel loss. In our model, the single dilation rate is replaced by 3D Kronecker convolution, and 3D Feature Selection (3DFSC) is used for the local learning of features. The proposed research enhances feature representation and classification accuracy while mitigating model degradation. Authors evaluate the model on the Paderborn University and MFPT bearing datasets. KCFP achieves round (99.6%) classification accuracy, outperforming the MFF-DRN (98.6%) and standard CNN (97.5%) models for the Paderborn University dataset. KCFP achieves round (97.6%) classification accuracy, outperforming the MFF-DRN (97.0%) and standard CNN (95.7%) models for the MFPT dataset. These results demonstrate the potential of KCFP for reliable and efficient rolling bearing fault diagnosis in industrial applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.768

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207